🔗 Share this article

You're probably familiar with Psycho, The Silence of the Lambs, and the horror staple. Maybe you've even read the original novels that served as the basis for the first two films. Now it's time to encounter the individual behind Norman Bates, Buffalo Bill, and Leatherface. The infamous Ed Gein!

The initial installments of this anthology series focused on the Milwaukee monster – an individual possessing strong recognition. This was followed by the sibling duo – a somewhat specialized story for enthusiasts of the genre. Attention now shifts to the Plainfield Ghoul. While he may lack the brand recognition of other notorious killers, and his confirmed victims number just two, his postmortem violations and macabre artistry with female corpses have left a lasting mark. To this day, any film or show featuring mutilated bodies, removed epidermis, or items crafted from human tissue probably owes a debt to his actions from many decades past.

A Tone of Flippancy

Is my tone too casual? It's clearly the deliberate approach of the production team. Rarely have I seen a drama that lingers so gleefully on the worst depredations an individual – and humanity – can commit. This extends to a significant plotline devoted to the horrors of the Third Reich, shown with minimal moral context.

Effective Pacing and Narrative

In terms of construction and style, the series excels. The rhythm is well-maintained, and the clever interweaving of different timelines is handled masterfully. We see Charlie Hunnam as the killer in action – the homicides, grave robberies, and assembling his collection. In parallel, the present-day narrative follows the creative minds as they craft the iconic film from the literary source. The blending of factual elements – his devout parent and his obsession with female doppelgangers – and the unreal – lurid portrayals of the Buchenwald criminal and Nazi party scenes – is executed proficiently.

A Critical Shortcoming

What it lacks, in a truly unacceptable way, is any moral dimension or deeper insight to counterbalance the lingering, loving shots of his immoral deeds. The show presents his rich inner world and positions him as a helpless individual of his controlling parent and an accomplice with dark interests. The underlying suggestion seems to be: How could a mentally ill man resist? In one scene, the novelist speculates that without seeing certain images, Gein would have remained an unremarkable local.

Breaking from Past Success

One might contend that a show from this stable – renowned for sleek, exaggerated aesthetics – is the wrong place for deep psychological exploration. However, earlier series like the OJ Simpson trial drama offered sharp analysis on media and justice. The Versace murder story explored fame and culture. The Clinton scandal series examined systemic sexism. So it can be done, and the producer has succeeded before.

The Final Verdict

But not here. This installment feels like an exploitation of a lesser-known criminal case. It demands sympathy for the individual responsible without providing understanding into his transformation. Aside from the reductive "religious mother" reasoning, there is no attempt to understand the creation or prevent future cases. It is nothing but gratuitous spectacle to the basest instincts of the audience. The Nazi scenes do have excellent cinematography, admittedly.