🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

Latvia's parliament members have voted to pull out from an global treaty created to protect women from abuse, covering family violence, following extensive and heated discussions in the parliament.

Several thousand of protesters gathered in Riga this week to oppose the decision. The ultimate authority now lies with Head of State Edgars Rinkevics, who must determine whether to endorse or veto the proposed law.

Referred to as the European treaty, the 2011 agreement only took effect in Latvia last twelve months ago, requiring authorities to develop legal frameworks and assistance programs to end all forms of abuse.

The Baltic nation has become the first European Union member to initiate the procedure of withdrawing from the convention. Turkey pulled out in 2021, a decision that rights groups characterized as a significant setback for gender equality.

Political Controversy and Opposition

The international agreement was approved by the EU in 2023, yet conservative groups have argued that its focus on gender equality weakens family values and advances what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a lengthy debate in the Saeima, lawmakers voted by a margin of 56-32 to withdraw from the convention, a action sponsored by political opponents but backed by politicians from one of the three governing partners.

The result represents a defeat for moderate conservative government leader Evika Silina, who joined protesters outside parliament earlier this seven-day period. "We refuse to give up, we will persist in our struggle so that abuse does not triumph," she stated to the assembly.

Ideological Disagreements and Reactions

One of the primary political groups supporting the exit is Latvia First, whose head has called on citizens to select from what he terms a "natural family" and "non-binary concepts with multiple sexes".

Latvia's human rights commissioner Karina Palkova appealed for the agreement not to be made political, while the organization Equality Now stated it was "not a threat to Latvian values, it served as a tool to achieve them".

The Thursday's decision has sparked broad outcry both inside Latvia and abroad.

Twenty-two thousand individuals have signed a national petition calling for the treaty to be maintained. The gender equality group Centrs Marta has called a demonstration for next Thursday, charging lawmakers of ignoring the will of the nation's citizens.

Global Concerns and Potential Next Steps

The leader of the European organization's parliamentary assembly commented that the Baltic state had made a hasty choice driven by false information. He characterized it as an "never-before-seen and extremely worrying step backward for women's rights and fundamental freedoms in Europe".

He noted that since the transcontinental nation abandoned the treaty four years ago, instances of gender-based killings and violence against women had increased significantly.

Because the vote did not secure a supermajority majority, the head of state could potentially return the legislation for further consideration if he holds concerns.

Head of State the national leader stated on social media that he would assess the vote according to constitutional requirements, "taking into account governmental and judicial factors, instead of ideological or political perspectives".

Last week, another member of the governing alliance, the reformist party, indicated it would not exclude appealing to the Constitutional Court.

"This decision represents a concerning development for women's rights not only in Latvia but across Europe," stated a human rights advocate.

• Family violence rates have been rising in several European countries
• The European treaty mandates particular safeguards for survivors of gender-based violence
• The nation's vote could influence similar debates in additional EU countries