🔗 Share this article

Iturns out he could survive defeat by lower-league opposition. Survive losing a crucial continental showpiece versus one of the worst Tottenham teams for many years. He withstood losing at home to West Ham and Wolves, a lowly league position, his rigid approach, undermining some of the club’s most promising academy products, the 32% win rate, calling the squad the poorest in Manchester United history. But there was a single opponent against whom Ruben Amorim would not be allowed to dance. You come at Jason Wilcox, and you best not miss.

Unfortunately, like many a top-flight right-back in Blackburn’s championship 1994-95 season, Amorim came at the executive and seems to have failed. Even the most casual observer will notice the irony here: a coach who often railed at his players for failing in one-on-one duels succumbing in the face of the white heat and formidable presence of one of England's top division's most feared football executives.

In truth, this whole painful saga seems to paint Jason Wilcox in a whole new light. It may have been tempting, given his brief stint of experience at Southampton, to view him as merely a functionary in the United exoskeleton: an individual whose appointment was due largely to his close relationship with his former boss Omar Berrada as any verifiable talent. How wrong everyone was. By masterfully outsmarting the club's celebrated head coach, just as he bested the unfortunate a previous executive before him, Jason Wilcox has demonstrated to be among football's true generals: a strategic mind of which the club's mid-table rivals will now be justifiably concerned.

The Tactical Clash Over Formation and Philosophy

For example, it was Jason Wilcox , after having been part of the leadership that appointed the rigid 3-4-3 advocate the coach originally, played a key role in attempting to convince him to abandon his beloved 3-4-3. Naturally, these pleas were resisted. However, such directives carry more weight when issued by a man of a man the impeccable soccer background of Jason Wilcox, a veteran of international appearances and a contributor to a title-winning side decades past.

Perhaps in time Jason Wilcox might agree to explain his reasoning to the rest of us. Perhaps at some point he might be asked why Amorim is walking away with a full payout, with no compensation reduction clause activated. The director speaks rarely in public, for excellent reasons. The true intellectuals in football – men like Jason Wilcox – simply operate at a level exceeding our prosaic understanding. If he ever did speak, most likely we would perceive would be ultrasonic blips and four-dimensional whirring. Desiring an explanation is not quite the same as being prepared to receive.

An Ultimate Power In the Throne

But of course, in training our focus on Jason Wilcox we overlook the real power behind the club's current leadership. Jason Wilcox is, in reality, merely executing the commands of his line manager Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who in private has made very clear his preference for a four-man defense. It is reported, Ratcliffe has also proposed playing Bryan Mbeumo in a wing-back role. The owner is eager for United to adopt analytics and metrics. According to ESPN, during a leadership summit early in his minority ownership, he declared that the team's approach to football “shall be decided in this room”.

After all, Ratcliffe is a specialist in this technical football matters, drawing from his background in industry and yachting. Most importantly he remains immensely wealthy, and as we all know, the rich are superior: more insightful, sagacious, more tactically astute, simply superior. Who else would you trust to oversee a strategic plan of cost-cutting, the building of a new stadium that looks a lot like someone’s leftover knitting, the acquisition of a new striker?

The Modern Soccer Hierarchy: Directors Above Coaches

This is a trend that is becoming prevalent in top-tier football. For decades, teams mistakenly entrusted major sporting choices to low-level employees such as coaches, scouts – players themselves. Perhaps it was once possible for a young, visionary coach with ideas and drive to join an organization and see their vision through to completion. Yet how many businesses have these guys established? How many mass redundancies have they managed? Far preferable to invest the real power where it rightly belongs: the leadership tier, the casually dressed executives, the individuals with impressive LinkedIn profiles. Better by far to determine the tactics in the boardroom and appoint someone who will adapt their methods accordingly. If managers were formerly chefs, they are now more akin to Deliveroo drivers: not really responsible for the food, yet ultimately answerable should it be delivered cold or leaks out of the box.

In the meantime, their job is increasingly less about crafting the philosophy and more about marketing it: the receptionist of the operation, the public face for a club they can do little to influence. Enzo Maresca leads a team of literal children into Europe and wins domestic cups, and effectively is dismissed for talking. Wilfried Nancy finds his standing damaged whereas those individuals who hired him live to blunder another day.

The Modern Corporate Football: Accountability for the Coaches

And perhaps in a small way this is simply neoliberalism in action: the rise of a gilded overclass who are infallible, whose decisions remain untouchable, whose errors can invariably be resolved by sacking without justification. Hire the 3-4-3 coach only to dismiss him for playing too much 3-4-3. Hire the process guy and later discard them for taking excessive time. And above all show gratitude; for the incremental increases in ticket costs, for the latest player acquisitions, for the reality that the adults – however well qualified – are in charge.